ABSTRACT
Introduction: The goal of Orthodontic treatment is toimprove the patient’s life through enhancement of Dentofacialfunctions and esthetics. Paradigms have started to shift inOrthodontic world since the introduction of mini-implantsin the anchorage armamentarium. So the present study wasundertaken to analyse and compare the amount of Intrusionin maxillary anterior teeth segment using one and twominiscrews, while paying an utmost attention to patientscomfort and esthetics during the treatment.Material and Methods: The sample consisted of 20 subjectswith deep overbite and complete root formation with increasedincisor show. Lateral cephlogram and P.A Cephalogram wererecorded before placement of implant. Sample was furtherdivided in to two groups, Group I (Implant group one implantis placed between maxillary central incisors and two implantsplaced between second premolar and first molar) and GroupII (Implant Group with Power arms, one implant is placedbetween maxillary central incisor and power arms fabricatedon first molar bilaterally). Clinical evaluation of intrusion wasrecorded on every six weeks.Results: The mean intrusion achieved is 0.28mm per 6weeks interval of time in both groups suggesting there is nodifference in amount of intrusion achieved in both groups withp value of 0.697 which is statistically non-significant. Changein Frankfort mandibular plane angle was observed with GroupI and Group II.Conclusion: On the base of study it was concluded thatimplant and power arm is better choice for intrusion inmaxillary anterior segment for correction of deep overbite andcorrection of gummy smile with minimal effect on posteriorsegment